Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Programs topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board backs timeline to add boys volleyball program, aims for spring 2029

Lampeter-Strasburg SD Board of School Directors · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Lampeter‑Strasburg board reviewed a proposed timeline to launch a boys volleyball program and encouraged benchmarks such as building youth participation; administrators said participation in the 20s would support JV and varsity teams.

Board member Mr. Per presented a backward‑planned timeline showing the steps needed from June 2026 to a target spring 2029 start for a boys volleyball program at Lampeter‑Strasburg. He framed the timeline as a public, accountable roadmap rather than a resolution or an immediate vote: the document lists benchmarks including hiring a coach, designating gym space, and phased budget planning.

Dr. Lippy, present to answer technical questions, said the program’s viability depends on gradual growth in feeder programs: “I would argue we're looking for growth each year ... numbers in the 20s. That would be a good number to have a JV and a varsity boys volleyball team at the high school level,” she said.

Board members and community supporters praised the plan as a way to give interested youth and parents clarity about future opportunities. Members discussed practical issues — gym scheduling during spring, youth recruitment and marketing, and how offering a high‑school program can change youth participation choices — and said the timeline will help the board and administration stay accountable. Several board members emphasized that continued growth in youth programming and a firm commitment from the board would be conditions for moving forward.

The item was presented as a discussion; no formal vote was taken and the board scheduled follow‑up steps and public recordation of the timeline.