Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the H942 Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Agriculture committee straw‑polls to concur with Senate amendments to H942
Summary
The Agriculture, Food Resiliency, & Forestry Committee reviewed Senate amendments to H942 — adding a convenience‑store exception to unit‑pricing rules, converting an equine‑farming buildings change into a study, and expanding READ priority projects — and straw‑polled 8–0 to concur with the Senate package.
Get email alerts on the H942 Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Agriculture, Food Resiliency, & Forestry Committee reviewed the Senate’s proposed instances of amendment to H942, a miscellaneous agricultural‑subjects bill, and straw‑polled to recommend concurrence with the Senate changes.
Bradley, of the Office of Legislative Council, told the committee the packet contains multiple instances of amendment. The first inserts a definition of “convenience store” into the unit‑pricing provisions so that convenience stores — described in the amendment as motor‑fuel stores selling everyday items such as fuel, tobacco, made‑to‑order food, snacks and beverages — can fall within the existing exception to unit pricing. Bradley said the Secretary of Agriculture would have discretion to determine whether a retail establishment qualifies as a convenience store.
The package also would have permitted equine ("equin") farming to enroll both agricultural land and farm buildings in the state’s use‑value appraisal program; Senate Finance converted that provision into a directed study. As written in the amendment the commissioner of taxes “shall study and provide recommendations for including equin farming in the use value appraisal program” and submit those recommendations, including an analysis of potential fiscal impact for permitting agricultural land and farm buildings, to the agriculture and finance committees on or before December 15, 2026.
Committee members pressed staff on what buildings eligibility would mean in practice. Bradley explained land used for grazing may already be eligible to enroll in current use, but there is not presently a clear pathway for enrolling specialized farm buildings — for example indoor arenas, riding rings or stables — and that enrolling buildings typically requires the owner to meet the farmer‑income test (earning half of household/business income from the business of farming). "Gain is income even if you're operating at a loss," Bradley said in explaining the statutory meaning of "gain."
Bradley and several members also flagged potential fiscal tradeoffs: expanding current use to include buildings could shift costs to the education fund and put upward pressure on property taxes, a primary reason Senate Finance sought a fiscal study rather than immediate statutory expansion. Members urged the study group to consider edge cases — for example diversified farms or operations that use horses but are not primarily equine businesses — so the recommendation can address real‑world ambiguities.
The packet also includes a change to the Rural Economic Development Initiative (READ). The amendment adds a new project type, "community development initiatives" (priority projects located throughout the state that support agriculture, historic preservation, outdoor recreation and other critical development needs), permitting READ to assist priority agricultural and economic development projects outside communities under 5,000 residents while retaining language that READ "primarily" supports rural areas. Bradley said the Housing Conservation Board had previewed that language to the committee and that the Senate conformed the priority‑project text to READ’s current practice.
A small set of technical, conforming changes to earlier bills (including S60 and S323) are included in the packet; Bradley noted the package adopts a conservative "belt and suspenders" drafting approach and that the act’s effective date is July 1, 2026. The equine‑study deadline is set for December 15, 2026.
The committee conducted a show‑of‑hands straw poll to record whether members would concur with the Senate’s instances of amendment. Jed Lipsky read names; the transcript records the following yes votes: Jonathan Bartholomew, Michelle Boslin, Jack Bigham, Gregory (Greg) Bert, Jed Lipsky, Richard Nelson, John O'Brien and Chair David Dery. The moderator recorded the vote as eight yes. The committee indicated it would move to concur and the bill could reach the floor later the same day.
Next steps: the commissioner of taxes will begin the directed study on equine farming’s inclusion in use‑value appraisal, due to the listed committees by December 15, 2026; the committee recorded a recommendation to concur with the Senate package and members expected floor action soon.

