Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Labor Relations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves memorandum adding lunchroom supervisors to CESPA bargaining unit

Cary Community Consolidated School District 26 Board of Education · May 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Cary CCSD 26 board approved a memorandum of agreement to add lunchroom supervisors to the CESPA (IEA‑NEA) bargaining unit after negotiations following an Illinois Labor Relations Board certification; the board approved the MOA unanimously.

The Cary Community Consolidated School District 26 Board of Education unanimously approved a memorandum of agreement on May 26 to add the district’s lunchroom supervisors to the CESPA (IEA‑NEA) bargaining unit.

Dr. Thomas told the board the change followed a certification by the Illinois Labor Relations Board in November 2025 and negotiations earlier this year. “It was a successful negotiation,” Dr. Thomas said, adding that the MOA places the affected employees in compensation groups with annual increases aligned to other CESPA employees and confirms a standard work schedule (10 hours per week: two hours a day for five days).

Board members moved and seconded the motion and approved it by roll call vote. All six voting members — Stacy Salt, Darling, Julie Jetty, Bridget Sandlin, Mindy Hartman and Jason Jansik — voted yes; one member, Katherine Potter, was absent.

The memorandum was described as an update to the existing CESPA contract; board materials note that the agreement aligns pay treatment and work-hour definitions for the newly included group. The board did not amend the MOA on the dais and did not record any objections during discussion.

The board’s approval completes the local bargaining step; implementation details such as adjusted payroll placement and effective dates were included in the board packet but were not elaborated on during the public meeting. The board moved on to other agenda items after the vote.