Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Density topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff presents concept to allow detached, subdividable units in higher-density zones
Summary
City liaison Marshall relayed a developer request to let detached structures be subdivided like common-wall units in higher-density zones. Staff outlined considerations — minimum lot/unit sizes, setbacks, building-code minimums (375–425 sq ft), and potential impacts — and said he would send a concept email for commissioners to decide whether to schedule a detailed discussion.
At the May 26 meeting, the Ocean Shores Planning Commission heard from city staff about a developer request to permit detached structures — not just common-wall buildings — to be subdividable into separate parcels in higher-density and commercial zones.
Marshall explained the current approach: common-wall structures (e.g., triplexes) in higher-density zones can be subdivided into separate parcels because of firewall construction and specific subdivision rules. A developer asked whether the city could allow similarly subdividable detached structures. Marshall said staff will prepare a concept email outlining options including whether to require a minimum dwelling size (the commission’s residential zones currently set 650 square feet as a reference minimum for standalone units) or to rely on building-code minimums (which staff said currently range between roughly 375 and 425 square feet for certain small dwelling units).
Why it matters: Allowing detached subdividable units could change incentives for buyers and developers and might increase homeownership opportunities compared with common-wall units. Commissioners and staff noted tradeoffs — design, setbacks, unit size and neighborhood character — and said the idea could be explored further if the commission wants a fuller discussion.
Next steps: Marshall said he would send commissioners a short written concept describing the developer’s request and the issues to consider. The commission may place the topic on a future agenda for detailed discussion if members want to pursue ordinance changes.
