Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nuisance Dogs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges tougher enforcement for daytime nuisance barking; city points to 30‑minute standard under state law
Summary
A resident asked the committee for stronger enforcement of daytime nuisance dog barking. Police and the city attorney said enforcement is constrained by state RSA language; officers can issue summonses for 30 minutes of continuous barking but verifying that standard often requires timestamped video evidence.
A Keene resident, introduced on the agenda as Terry Oor of 34 Hillside, asked the committee what steps can be taken about an ongoing neighbor‑dog barking problem during daytime hours. Oor said she had been documenting episodes for more than a year and that some episodes exceeded a half hour.
Police and staff told the committee that local ordinance language mirrors state RSA provisions and that enforcement is constrained by the statutory standard. "There's a 30‑minute standard, a standard of 30 minutes of constant barking which triggers our ability to issue tickets," a department representative explained, adding that meeting that continuous standard during daytime is often difficult for officers to verify.
Committee members and staff recommended documenting incidents with timestamped audio or video that can be verified by the police and noted that the animal control officer (part‑time) has already spoken to affected owners and offered behavioral suggestions. The city attorney said the city cannot legally impose stricter daytime standards than state law allows and that changes would require state‑level action.
The committee accepted the communication as informational and expressed sympathy for the resident while advising steps for verified documentation that could support enforcement.
