Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building 200 Site Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board approves Building 200 site improvements, including stormwater permit
Summary
The Littleton Planning Board voted to approve the Building 200 site‑improvement site plan, granting the stormwater permit and site‑plan decision after a presentation from TEC that addressed peer‑review comments and Littleton Fire Department sign‑off.
The Littleton Planning Board voted June 30 to approve the Building 200 site‑improvement site plan and its accompanying stormwater permit, following a presentation and peer‑review responses from consultant Chris Raymond of TEC.
Raymond told the board the work will add a circulation drive around Building 200, improved pedestrian connections, additional parking tied into a planned shared parking garage and a “state‑of‑the‑art” stormwater system to treat and detain runoff from the improvements. He said final utility connections will tie the building into recently installed site infrastructure and that the Littleton Fire Department has signed off on access changes.
Board members asked about parking adequacy and construction sequencing for a building that remains occupied. Raymond said the improvements will be built in phases so access to the occupied building is maintained; an initial phase will create a new rear access and stormwater system and later phases will formalize the front entrance and remaining parking. On EV charging, the plan proposes 10% EV‑ready spaces across the development; board members discussed whether clustering higher‑speed (Level 3) chargers in select locations might better serve retail visitors while leaving broader EV‑ready conduit for future tenant demand. “We want to be responsive and allow flexibility,” Raymond said when outlining the EV strategy.
The board closed the public hearing on the Building 200 item and then approved the site‑plan decision and stormwater permit by the recorded voice action on the meeting record. The transcript records the motion, a second, and the board’s affirmative response; no separate vote tally with member names appears in the record.
Next steps include final construction drawings and inspection coordination with town staff and the fire department. The board noted that any substantial future changes to the approved site plan would require subsequent board review.
The decision was taken under the board’s site‑plan and stormwater review authorities; peer‑review comments were addressed as part of the presentation.
