Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Detention Center Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Daviess County hires municipal advisor as jail renovation costs climb
Summary
The fiscal court approved an engagement letter with Robert W. Baird & Company to assist with bond financing for planned renovations to the Daviess County Detention Center after staff reported deficiencies and commissioners pressed for cost explanations.
Get email alerts on the Detention Center Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Daviess County Fiscal Court on May 28 approved an engagement letter with Robert W. Baird & Company to provide municipal advisory services in connection with potential bond financing for renovations and improvements to the Daviess County Detention Center.
County staff presented the engagement, explaining that a municipal financial advisory firm assists with legal documents, market preparation, regulatory disclosures and bond sale transactions. "By selecting a firm that will properly market our securities and transactions, they will ultimately allow the county to secure a competitive interest rate which over the life of any issuance will more than compensate for their service fee," Mr. Johnson told the court when recommending approval.
Commissioner Marksberry asked for a clearer public accounting of how the project cost escalated from earlier estimates in the low tens of millions to about $56 million. "Could someone just please explain to me how this all started and explain to the public how did we get in this situation?" he asked, noting state jail inspections and a subsequent study had identified a "whole slew of deficiencies" that led to the current scope.
Staff responded that the state conducts two annual jail inspections and that a consultant’s initial study identified many deficiencies that informed the larger renovation proposal. The court approved the municipal-advisor engagement by voice vote. No roll-call tally was recorded in the transcript.
County officials said the engagement is intended to position the county for any future financing decision; the engagement itself does not commit the county to an issuance without further approvals.

