Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fife council signals support for mid-range increase to transportation and parks impact fees
Summary
After a presentation on methodology and fee options, councilors signaled agreement on a mid-range option that would raise total impact fees for a new single-family home to about $10,960 and directed staff to draft an ordinance implementing that option; timing of an inflation escalator remains conditional on the adoption date.
FIFE — The Fife City Council on March 10 moved toward adopting a mid-range update to the city nd parks impact fees, signaling agreement with staff nd some council members to advance what staff labeled Option 3.
Director Chris Larson told the council the city must follow the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip-generation methodology to avoid legal risk and explained four options that ranged from keeping current fees to phased increases and inflation adjustments. "If we deviate from that approach, we risk legal action," Larson said, urging the council to follow standard trip-generation practice and to consider vacancy-credit rules and inflation indexing.
Option 3, the mid-range choice, would set a parks impact fee at $3,060 and a transportation impact fee at $7,900, for a total of about $10,960 for an average single-family residence, as shown by staff calculations. Larson recommended allowing new developments to receive credit for existing uses on a site rather than adopting an arbitrary vacancy threshold, calling that approach easier to administer and legally defensible.
Council members debated the tradeoffs. Deputy Mayor Murphy (who opened the discussion) and Council members Fagundes and Dominique voiced support for option 3 as a compromise that keeps Fife roughly comparable to nearby jurisdictions without imposing the fastest ramp-up option recommended by the planning commission. "It's a step and it's a thumbs up towards making housing a little bit more affordable," one council member said, arguing the mid-range option balances revenue needs with affordability concerns. Other members urged caution and supported delaying larger increases.
Larson said the council could adopt the mid-range amounts in an ordinance and decide when to start the inflation escalator: if the fees take effect before July 1, staff proposed beginning inflation adjustments in calendar year 2027; if adoption occurs after July 1, inflation would begin in 2028. Council direction was to return an ordinance based on Option 3 for adoption in the coming months, with staff to bring back the precise effective date and related code amendments.
The council did not vote on the ordinance March 10; staff said the ordinance would be prepared for a future meeting with implementation details and inflation timing.
