Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Signage Coa topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applicant seeks approval for new sign at 200 West College Street; minutes approved
Summary
At a McMinnville meeting, the applicant for 200 West College Street presented a new back-of-building sign and staff recommended approval; the panel approved the COA by voice vote and also approved the April 7 minutes. Vote tallies were not recorded in the transcript.
An applicant sought approval for a new sign at 200 West College Street and the meeting approved the April 7 minutes during a session in which no governing body name is specified in the transcript.
Philip, introduced by the presiding speaker as the person presenting the project, said the work on the building is complete except for “the awning on the front part of the building,” and that the applicant was seeking permission to add signage on the back. Philip told the group he had photographs to show the panel and described the signage as part of final finishing touches.
A staff comment recorded in the transcript recommended approval. The staff speaker said, “The sign meets all the, applicable requirements of the sort of guidelines. ... It doesn't take up more than 50% of the wall,” and concluded that staff would recommend approval.
Following the presentation and the staff recommendation, the presiding speaker moved to approve the COA for 200 West College Street; the motion was seconded and the body approved the measure by a voice vote. The transcript records only vocal 'Aye' responses and does not provide a numerical tally or identify individual votes by name.
Earlier in the meeting the presiding speaker asked for a motion to approve the minutes from April 7; a motion and second were recorded and the minutes were approved by voice vote (the transcript does not provide a numerical tally or consistently identify the mover and seconder). The meeting confirmed a data center meeting for the following night and then adjourned.
The transcript records some informal discussion about the sign design (several speakers described the mark as looking like a “mustache” before clarifying it as a stylized letter); participants also briefly praised the continued improvements downtown. The transcript does not name the governing body holding the meeting, does not supply vote tallies, and contains some ambiguity in speaker labels for the staff comment recorded in the file.
