Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Art topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gig Harbor Arts Commission to broaden Grandview snag-art call after no applicants
Summary
Commissioners agreed to expand a stalled call for artists for the Harbor/Grandview snag-art project — originally focused on carved tree snags — to allow embellishments (mosaics, stone markers, fairy-house installations) and to promote the opportunity more widely; the commission will draft revised language and pursue parks and outreach options.
The Gig Harbor Arts Commission moved Friday to broaden its call for artists for the Harbor/Grandview snag-art project after receiving no applications under the original carving-focused notice. Chair Sonia Johnson told commissioners, “We have not received any application,” and said the commission had also received an email from the project’s former lead describing installation challenges that would have required heavy equipment from Public Works.
The commission’s discussion centered on whether to keep the project strictly to carved snags or permit a wider range of low-impact "embellishment," including stone mosaics, embedded markers, or small community-built "fairy houses." "I thought the idea of putting all this other art in there kind of took away from what a cool carving forest would look like," one commissioner said; Carolyn Branges, vice chair, urged outreach to local artists and offered to help promote the revised call through the Peninsula Art League’s newsletter.
Why it matters: the commission already has money set aside for the installation and wants the project to proceed this year rather than letting the funds lapse. Commissioners said flexibility in acceptable media could increase proposals and make installations easier to site and maintain without city machinery.
Key details: the application deadline originally listed was May 1; the group discussed the example award figure in the call (about $7,500 for a single artist) but agreed that multiple, smaller awards could be made if proposals and budgets allow. Commissioners also flagged safety and maintenance: attachments that fragment or create shards as they weather would require Public Works input on installation methods and long-term upkeep. Johnson said she will check contract language and confirm whether maintenance is expected of the city or the artist.
Next steps: the commission asked Branges to identify alternative park sites and asked staff member Tiffany to compile dates for creative-endeavor recipients to help with outreach. Chair Johnson said she will draft revised call language and a letter to City Council and Public Works to clarify maintenance expectations and to ask the city to prioritize needed work on the parks so the project can move forward.
Public outreach and promotion: commissioners agreed to solicit broader promotion — suggested channels included the Washington State Arts Commission and the Peninsula Art League’s biweekly creative brief and digital magazine — and to include photo examples so potential applicants can better imagine feasible installations.
The Arts Commission did not take a formal vote on funding changes at the meeting; members described the actions as direction to staff and to the commission’s project leads. The commission adjourned after setting those next steps.
