Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Pool topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears plans for new community pool; parks group urges needs assessment and LEDC financing review

Llano City Council / Board of Adjustments · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Parks Project representatives and councilmembers discussed scope, sites and financing for a new Llano community pool; staff and volunteers recommended a needs assessment, community engagement and exploring LEDC sales-tax revenue bonds as a funding option.

Council discussed a multi-pronged approach to a new community pool: Parks Project representatives urged a needs assessment and a data-driven site selection, and a public commenter outlined financing options including use of LEDC (type B EDC) sales-tax revenue bonds. A parks project representative said the group would gather data to present site options and cost estimates and recommended careful community engagement before choosing a final design.

Members raised constraints on site selection—Badu Park was frequently mentioned but several speakers noted much of that park is county-owned and in the floodplain, making it unsuitable without mitigation. Council discussed two possible RFQ approaches: (1) issue a focused RFQ with site and specs for a desired project, or (2) seek conceptual proposals and ideas from designers. Staff warned about the costs of construction administration and the importance of retaining engineering oversight: design and administration costs could run 8–12% of the project.

A public commenter recommended the council ask the Llano Economic Development Corporation (LEDC) to evaluate financing options, saying sales-tax revenue bonds (issued by a type B EDC) have been used locally to fund past projects. Councilmembers agreed that multiple funding sources—EDC, county, private donors and grants—should be explored rather than placing the full burden on a single entity. The council did not adopt funding actions but asked staff and volunteers to proceed with a needs assessment and community engagement.