Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Operations Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Groveland council directs staff to prepare RFP for citywide operational audit
Summary
Following a presentation comparing operational audit and assessment approaches and vendor proposals, the Groveland City Council directed staff by consensus on May 18 to prepare a formal Request for Proposals for a citywide operational audit to evaluate organizational effectiveness and internal controls.
Get email alerts on the Operations Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chief Operating Officer Michelle Michnoff presented Council with options for a citywide review of operations on May 18, explaining differences between a formal operational audit and a broader operational assessment. Michnoff summarized proposals and price ranges from several firms: Aclarian (operational assessment; noted in materials at $84,700), Aline Accounting Partners (larger-scope option in the presentation materials), Carr, Riggs & Ingram (audit-focused approach), and Cherry Bekaert (faster-delivery option). The presentation distinguished an audit's compliance and control focus from an assessment's improvement and capacity-building emphasis.
Council members discussed tradeoffs. Council Member Amy Jo Carroll expressed support for an assessment approach based on prior positive work from Aclarian, while Vice Mayor Gaines preferred using a firm with no prior city involvement to ensure independence. Mayor Keith Keogh emphasized the need for a thorough review of systemic risks and internal controls beyond a lighter-touch assessment. After discussion, the council reached consensus directing staff to prepare a formal Request for Proposals for a citywide operational audit so the city can obtain an independent, comprehensive review.
The presentation materials noted this item is not budgeted and would require a budget amendment if Council proceeds; staff indicated an audit path may require a formal sealed RFP when estimated cost thresholds are exceeded and identified optional delivery timelines and pricing presented by respondents.
