Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Façade Renovation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board approves façade renovation at 188 Broadway with design conditions
Summary
The Amityville Planning Board approved revised façade plans for 188 Broadway (Amity Realty), requiring larger crown molding, a 12‑inch freeze board, and adjusted vertical elements to coordinate with signage and lighting; the vote was 5–0.
The Amityville Planning Board voted 5–0 Jan. 8 to approve revised façade work at 188 Broadway (SCTM #101‑5‑2‑16.1) after the applicant submitted drawings that addressed prior board suggestions.
Elia Hajjar applied for architectural review under Section 24‑6 A.(1)(g) of the Village Code; contractor Michael Ahl presented the revised drawings and said the changes reflect the board’s earlier suggestions, adding boxed panels, crown molding and a pronounced freeze board. Member Mary D'Andrea praised the general concept but pressed for changes to proportions and detail, noting the finished sample looked different than the initial drawing and recommending larger crown moldings, corbels or dental trim to match surrounding storefronts.
Chairperson Stephen Greenwald opened the vote after the board agreed on three stipulations. "We want to get this passed, we want to get this approved tonight," Greenwald said as the board moved to finalize conditions. Member D'Andrea said she had "seen your moldings around town; they are beautiful" and offered to meet with the contractor to finalize panel placement. Contractor Michael Ahl agreed to adjust panels so vertical elements project slightly and to modify the profiles and spacing to accommodate signs and goose‑neck lighting.
The board’s approval is conditioned on these design stipulations: larger crown molding with more detail; a 12‑inch freeze board between the brickwork to alter the façade proportion; and adjusted vertical elements so they project forward and work with signage and lighting. Member Amanda Lowe seconded Greenwald’s motion; the board voted 5–0 in favor.
The board did not record additional administrative conditions beyond the three design stipulations; the applicant must still obtain any required building permits and comply with Village and other applicable codes.
