Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the 3335 Caroline Redevelopment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Developers present revised five‑story Caroline Street plan as board, neighbors press for corner redesign

Saratoga Springs Design Review Board · September 11, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Developers seeking approval for a five‑story mixed‑use building at 3335 Caroline Street faced sustained scrutiny from the Saratoga Springs Design Review Board and dozens of public commenters over height, massing, and first‑floor storefront design. The board provided extensive design feedback and asked the applicant to return with corner and fenestration revisions.

John Kenny, representing the project team, told the Design Review Board on Sept. 11 that the 3335 Caroline Street proposal restores the historic scale of Kearney’s Block with a five‑story, mixed‑use building featuring retail on the ground floor and residential condominiums above. “We are proposing a basement with vehicle elevators … 36 total valet spaces,” said James Christopher, presenting for 6 86 architects, while walking the board through elevations and a revised step‑back strategy meant to break up the building’s massing.

Why it matters: The site is a prominent corner in the Urban Core zoning district where scale and street engagement shape how new development is judged for compatibility with Saratoga Springs’ historic downtown. Board members and preservation advocates said this proposal will set a precedent for future infill projects on Caroline Street and urged care in aligning materials, rhythm and the corner treatment.

Board members repeatedly singled out the building’s corner and the first‑floor storefront rhythm as decisive. “The corner needs to be more prominent,” said Chair Tammy Anger, summing up board concerns after a panel discussion that ranged from floor‑to‑floor heights to balcony details. Committee members pressed the applicants to revise the storefront fenestration and provide a clearer architectural rhythm between ground‑floor bays and upper‑floor pilasters.

Public comment was sharply divided. Griffin Clancy, who owns the adjacent Clancy’s Tavern, urged approval and called the project a catalyst for further investment on the lower end of Caroline Street. Preservation Foundation president Samantha Bosshardt recommended a four‑story mass with a fifth‑floor setback, arguing that a shorter podium and stronger corner anchor would better respect nearby historic properties.

What the board asked for: The board asked the applicant to return with: a stronger corner expression or ‘anchor’ treatment; revised storefront fenestration and additional entrances on Pavilion Row; material samples and larger‑scale sections showing how the proposed parapet, cornices and stepbacks will read at eye level; and options that avoid a single, unbroken street wall. Members also requested a clear demonstration of how the proposed height compares with nearby approved projects.

Next steps: The board did not vote on final approvals. The applicant was invited to refine elevations and materials and return to the board with the requested drawings and column/porch details at a future hearing.