Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Data Centers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chesterfield County Council approves temporary moratorium on data‑center proposals through Jan. 1, 2028
Summary
After a packed public hearing in which residents raised water, energy and land‑use concerns, Chesterfield County Council voted to pause acceptance of data‑center project proposals until Jan. 1, 2028 to allow further study and development of guardrails.
Get email alerts on the Data Centers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chesterfield County Council voted to adopt a temporary moratorium on accepting data‑center project proposals, a pause the body said will extend through Jan. 1, 2028, to give officials time to study potential local impacts and develop appropriate regulations.
The move followed an extended public hearing where multiple residents urged the council to block or delay data‑center development. "A single data center can use as much water as a city of 50,000 people," Deborah Adams told the council, citing analyses she said show sharp rises in household energy costs tied to data‑center buildouts. Brad Turley asked, "Who benefits?" and several speakers said the projects would pressure farmland and local water supplies and that the county needs stronger transparency about prospective developers.
Council members repeatedly clarified they were voting on a moratorium — a temporary pause on accepting proposals — not on a specific data‑center project. Chair Mary Anderson explained the moratorium is meant to let the county "see the pluses and the pros and the cons and any guard rails we might need to put up," rather than react to one developer.
After public comment closed, the council made and seconded a motion and approved the moratorium by voice vote; a roll‑call tally was not read on the record. The moratorium was described on the record as designed to stop acceptance of new project proposals until Jan. 1, 2028 so officials can study energy, water, emergency‑response and land‑use implications and hold additional public outreach.
The council and staff noted next steps will include gathering technical information and listening to experts and residents; the transcript references a public informational session facilitated by the South Carolina Energy Justice Coalition scheduled June 11 in Marville County (staff said they would post details on the county website). The moratorium does not retroactively change existing permits or approvals; it pauses new proposal intake only.
What happens next: the council expects staff briefings and technical study work during the moratorium period and additional opportunities for public input before any permanent regulation or ordinance would be adopted.

