Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Accountability topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District 186 briefed on ISBE redesign of accountability ratings; "exemplary" tied to 75% proficiency

Springfield School District 186 Board of Education · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dr. Scott outlined Illinois' shift from percentile-based school comparisons to fixed proficiency-and-indicator-based summative designations; exemplary now requires 75% proficiency on state assessments and set growth/attendance thresholds.

Dr. Scott presented the Illinois State Board of Education's redesigned school accountability framework and its local implications during the June 1 board meeting. Under the redesign, schools will be compared to fixed proficiency and indicator benchmarks rather than to each other, Dr. Scott said, and will receive a single summative designation driven by indicator performance.

Key thresholds described: exemplary status requires 75% or more of students proficient on state assessments (ILLINOIS assessments for grades 3—8 and ACT for 11th grade); composite growth expectations are 67.5% for elementary and 60% for high school; attendance is reframed as continuous attendance (exemplary threshold cited around 88%); and subgroup performance can prevent an otherwise exemplary rating. "So in order for a school to be exemplary ... you have to have 75% or more of the students in your school proficient on the state assessment," Dr. Scott said.

Board members asked whether attendance still meaningfully affects summative designation and how coding/audit work at the district has reduced prior inconsistencies. Dr. Scott and district staff said attendance will not harm summative designation but can lift a score if exemplary, and that the district has audited attendance coding and will continue monitoring. District staff cautioned that October baseline designations might show unexpected changes as the state implements the new method.

What's next: district leaders said they will analyze local school data against the new fixed benchmarks and provide guidance to principals on targets and monitoring in the coming months.