Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Consent Agenda topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Maple Shade council approves consent agenda, approves bill list totaling $6.6 million across funds

Maple Shade Township Council · December 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved Resolutions 2025-R210 through R-218 and the municipal bill list; one councilor announced intentions to vote no on two resolutions and the mayor abstained on R-211. The clerk presented fund totals and recommended payment when funds are available.

The Maple Shade Township Council moved and approved the consent agenda covering Resolutions 2025-R210 through R-218 during its Dec. 11 regular meeting. The motion passed after roll call; one councilor said during debate they intended to vote "no" on R-211 and R-217, and Mayor Tallerico announced an abstention on R-211.

Township finance information presented by the clerk showed the bill list totals for payment recommendation: current fund $5,149,119.96; utility fund $447,654.83; capital fund $365,380.23; utility capital $84,248.57; trust fund $544,249.80; and grant fund $21,842.59. The clerk noted statutory payments included school and county taxes embedded in the current-fund total and recommended payment "when funds are available."

Earlier in the meeting council discussed a resolution to appoint Matt Morsini as interim fire official, a temporary appointment to comply with the state 45‑day requirement after the prior fire official left. Council members confirmed Morsini is working under a shared-service arrangement with Morstown and that the interim appointment is effective immediately to ensure a licensed official is in place for inspections and reporting.

What happens next: The consent agenda passed as presented. Council recorded an abstention on R-211 and at least one councilor signaled opposition to R-211 and R-217 during debate; no further formal action on those individual resolutions was recorded at the meeting.