Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Economy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council asks staff to review cannabis dispensary tax receipts and social-equity licensing

Pasco City Council · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council directed staff to coordinate with the Liquor and Cannabis Board to confirm city receipts from local dispensaries (reported as roughly $43,000) and to analyze expanding social-equity licenses; council members debated revenue potential, public-health research and city image.

Council members asked staff to investigate whether the city is receiving the correct amount of tax revenue from local cannabis dispensaries and to return with an option to increase social-equity licenses.

A council member reported the city receiving about $43,000 in cannabis-related tax receipts and asked staff to work with the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board to verify whether that number is correct and whether the city is missing revenue. He also asked staff to prepare a presentation on expanding social-equity licenses — a licensing category intended to increase business access for people affected by prior enforcement actions or targeted by past drug policy — to see whether additional permits could generate revenue for city services.

Other council members warned about public-health impacts documented in recent studies and about the city’s image if it expanded cannabis retail. A mix of members said they wanted the staff report before changing policy: some supported exploring the revenue opportunity and social-equity goals, others said they would oppose expansion on public-health or neighborhood-quality grounds. Staff agreed to coordinate with the Liquor and Cannabis Board and to prepare a follow-up presentation to the council.

Staff did not present a formal financial analysis in the meeting; the council’s instruction was to bring back verified tax-receipt figures and options for licensing changes.