Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Attica Park Board discusses pavilion painting, storage shed, tennis courts and bridge work
Summary
Board members reviewed several maintenance and capital items — authorizing a storage shed, planning pavilion paint/stain, shelving and volunteer installation, tennis-court resurfacing quotes, and bridge timelines — and requested follow-ups and vendor quotes.
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Attica Park Board spent much of its meeting on capital and maintenance items, approving a storage-shed authorization and outlining next steps for pavilion painting, tennis-court resurfacing and bridge repairs.
Members agreed on a plan to paint and stain pavilions to a matching color (described as a tan/gray with white trim and a brown metal roof) and discussed timing with contractors to reduce future maintenance. The board also described specifications for a storage shed with shelving sized for totes; members discussed a $3,000–$4,000 vendor quote versus volunteer-built shelving, and estimated a three- to four-week delivery turnaround if purchased.
Tennis-court condition and resurfacing were reviewed; members cited a prior resurfacing quote near $50,000 to remove the old surface down to asphalt. The board discussed incorrect prior surface coatings and the need for full resurfacing for a long-term fix. Members asked Nancy and others to follow up on quotes and contract details.
Bridge work was also discussed. Members reported a contractor is expected to set posts and pour concrete soon but noted past schedule delays; they considered contracting options that include milestone payments or per-day penalties to reduce timeline slippage. Members said the final bridge could cost more if donated I-beams are no longer available.
The board asked staff to collect firm contractor quotes, verify delivery and installation timelines for the shed, and return with budget figures for upcoming budget sessions. No formal appropriation vote was recorded in the transcript during this discussion.
Quotes and cost estimates mentioned in the meeting were presented by members and included approximations; the transcript does not contain a complete vendor list or binding contract approvals.

