Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees debate what qualifies as a 'material change' to approved site plans
Summary
Trustees and the village attorney debated whether post‑approval changes — notably reducing a building from three stories to two — should automatically trigger a new public review; the board directed staff to continue code revisions to define 'material change.'
Trustees spent significant time discussing how Peoria Heights’ zoning code treats changes to approved site plans after developers begin building. The village attorney told trustees the current ordinance lacks a precise definition of what constitutes a ‘material change’ and advised the board to judge materiality by whether the zoning board would have ruled differently had it seen the change before approval.
Examples the attorney cited that would likely be material include adding 20% to a building footprint or moving a structure substantially closer or farther from the street; more modest adjustments may not always qualify. Trustee D'Vor said the specific change in a recent redevelopment — moving from an originally presented three‑story design to a two‑story design — was a material change that affected how trustees voted when the site plan was approved. D'Vor urged clearer language and process so future post‑approval alterations return to public review.
Trustees and staff also discussed practical implementation: a more detailed code similar to neighboring municipalities (which have larger planning staffs) would be harder to implement locally. Staff acknowledged consultants are working on a zoning-code rewrite and that Village Planner Rick Pitzell is reviewing proposed language. Trustees requested that code revisions include clear, implementable triggers that require developers to return to public hearings when substantive changes occur.
What’s next: staff and legal counsel will continue code-rewrite work and return draft language that defines material site-plan changes and appropriate procedural steps for requiring renewed review.
