Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procedural Pud Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board pauses lot‑line adjustment amid questions about PUD amendment; hearing continued to July 7
Summary
The board continued a public hearing on a technical lot‑line adjustment affecting East View Common Land after members raised legal questions about whether the change would amend recorded PUD (PER) documents and whether the selectboard and conservation easement holders were properly notified. The board voted to continue the application to July 7 with one opposed.
The Rindge Planning Board on Monday agreed to continue a public hearing on a technical subdivision/lot‑line adjustment that would reallocate a narrow strip of common land between two parcels in the East View area. Board members expressed uncertainty about whether the proposed change would require a formal amendment to the recorded Planned Unit Residential Development (PUD/PER) plan, which could require additional notice and approval steps.
Planning staff reviewed the application materials and noted the parcels involved (tax map 11, lots 36 and 36‑1‑21). Several members said the homeowners association owns the common land and that a conservation easement in favor of the town applies to the parcel; members questioned whether the selectboard and other parties required by the town’s application checklist had been properly notified.
Board members repeatedly asked for legal counsel to clarify whether a recorded PUD could be altered through a technical lot‑line adjustment and whether the board had authority to accept the application as a technical subdivision. One member summarized the procedural concern: accepting the application would start statutory time clocks while questions remain about whether a different application path (an amendment to the recorded plan and added public notice) is required.
Faced with those open legal and notice questions, the board voted to continue the matter to its July 7 meeting so staff can seek a formal legal opinion and confirm notice to affected parties. When the motion to continue was called, one member opposed; the motion carried and the hearing was continued.
Next steps: Planning staff said they will contact the town attorney, confirm whether the selectboard and conservation easement holder require formal notice, and advise the applicant on the correct filing type and any additional hearing notices required.
