Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Allocation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee tables 2027 capital cost-allocation plan for further vetting by Morehead

MAT Bus Coordinating Committee · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee discussed a proposed method to allocate the local share of 2027–2030 capital projects using a three-year rolling average and agreed to table the item after requests from Morehead to allow more time to vet revenue splits, JPA language and cash-flow impacts.

Jordan Smith, MAPA assistant transit director, presented a capital project cost-allocation methodology May 20 that would apportion the typical 20% local share across participating entities based on service metrics and a three-year rolling average. Jordan said the process smooths year-to-year shifts and that very large projects would be handled by separate agreements.

Morehead finance director Jennica Flanigan asked whether the FTA had been consulted about the allocation approach; Jordan said he had contacted FTA and was told local jurisdictions decide how to share local-cost responsibility. Flanigan said Morehead needed more time to integrate the five-year capital forecast into the city’s long-term review and cash-flow analysis and requested that the allocation be specified in the Joint Powers Agreement.

After discussion a motion to table consideration of the capital allocation plan was made and seconded; the motion carried by voice vote. Jennica said she expected to bring a revised package back in June or, more likely, July or August after legal review and partner input.

What it means: The proposed allocation would shift local shares gradually as service levels change and was designed to show cumulative local need (staff noted roughly $600,000 per year local need for Fargo alone under the model). Tabbing the item gives Morehead and other partners time to vet revenue splits, asset-sale proceeds and JPA language before approval.

Next steps: Staff will return with refinements and supporting documentation at a future committee meeting; Jennica asked that any allocation language be folded into the permanent JPA when it is finalized.