Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners refine vision, agree to ‘attainable’ housing language in comprehensive plan work session
Summary
During a work session after the June 2 meeting, Elbert County commissioners debated vision‑statement language and housing priorities, agreed to insert language crediting the planning commission in the visioning process, replace 'affordable' with 'attainable' in housing policy language, and to have staff add current entitlement counts to the existing‑conditions housing section.
After closing the Chevel public hearing, the Elbert County Planning Commission held a work session on a draft comprehensive plan, focusing on the vision statement, core principles and the housing chapter.
Nicole Hunt proposed language for the plan’s opening: “The comprehensive plan, vision, and core principles serve as the foundation of the plan, establishing preservation of rural character, agricultural land, and natural resources as the county's first priority, and guiding any future growth or development in a manner consistent with those values over the next 10 to 20 years.” Commissioners agreed to add a specific credit for the planning commission in the stated outreach and review sequence and to shorten some consultant text described by several commissioners as “fluff.”
A principal line of debate centered on housing and growth. Commissioner Dan Guthrie and others pressed for more ways to enable lower‑cost, entry‑level housing so workers (teachers, first responders, county staff) can live locally; others emphasized preserving rural character. Several speakers noted that the county has a large pipeline of entitled projects already—commissioners cited thousands of homes approved in recent years—and asked staff to add up‑to‑date entitlement counts to the plan’s existing‑conditions section so that the plan’s housing analysis reflects local reality.
On policy language, the commission agreed to replace the term "affordable" with "attainable" in several places to focus on entry‑level or workforce housing without invoking federal subsidy programs. They also directed staff to remove or clarify references to “clustered service areas” and to draft text noting that attainable housing is primarily appropriate in or near incorporated municipalities or other areas with centralized infrastructure.
Commissioners accepted a set of text swaps: adopt Nicole’s opening sentence, retain consultant material where it added useful context but strike or correct outreach graphics and attribution where they were inaccurate, and bring Kevin Kirkwood’s rewritten goals/strategies language into Chapter 5 (housing) with edits (including removal of a proposed grant‑strategy line that commissioners worried could imply federal low‑income housing programs).
Staff will incorporate the agreed wording changes and the county’s current entitlement counts into the plan for continued review; commissioners scheduled further work sessions and indicated the comprehensive plan will be revisited and updated periodically.
