Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cannabis Dispensary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends special use for cannabis dispensary at 9500 Ogden after debate over design, access and neighborhood impacts
Summary
The Planning & Zoning Commission voted to recommend approval of a special-use permit for a cannabis dispensary at 9500 Ogden Avenue (to operate as IC Brookfield/IC Collective) but attached conditions including hours, ownership transfer rules, a development timeline and an explicit requirement to improve the exterior facades; commissioners pressed the applicant and staff for stronger facade design, landscaping and clarity on alley access and traffic routing.
The Brookfield Planning & Zoning Commission on May 28 voted to recommend approval of a special-use permit for a cannabis dispensary at 9500 Ogden Avenue, forwarding the matter to the Village Board with several conditions and recommendations about design, access and redevelopment.
Tanya Griffin, representing a company called Water and Trees and working with operator IC Brookfield, presented plans to renovate the existing building, raise the roof, replace the facade, repave and restripe the parking lot and provide roughly 18 parking spaces. Griffin said the dispensary would use strong security protocols (24/7 video surveillance, secure vaults and restricted access), limit entry to adults, and prohibit on-site consumption or loitering. She also said the operation expects to generate tax revenue for the village and offered a conservative first-year tax estimate of about $151,000.
Staff told the commission the village owns the property and has been engaged in preliminary redevelopment discussions; staff recommended the commission forward a favorable recommendation subject to conditions, noting that a separate redevelopment agreement and additional design review will follow if the special-use is approved.
Public testimony included opposition from Emanuel KF Nancis, a Dubois Boulevard resident who said he feared increased nuisance and litter, cited nearby late-night music from other businesses and said he would organize opposition if the board approved the project. An anonymous written comment and other residents expressed concerns about traffic and the site’s impact on the neighborhood.
Commissioners focused their discussion on exterior design and activation of the Ogden-facing facades, egress and alley access, and the sequencing of a redevelopment agreement. Several commissioners urged the applicant to return with improved elevations and stronger landscaping treatments; staff and the applicant said more detailed architectural and MEP (mechanical, electrical and plumbing) work would follow if the special use is approved.
The commission’s recommendation included specific conditions: stated hours of operation (Monday–Saturday 9 a.m.–10 p.m., Sunday 9 a.m.–6 p.m.), a stipulation that any change of ownership requires amendment of the special use, a six-month timeline for the applicant to secure entitlements and commence the project (with abandonment rules if inactive for six consecutive months), development in substantial compliance with the submitted plans, and a requirement to improve the exterior facades (all sides) per staff guidance. Commissioners also discussed but did not finalize a specific alley-access condition; several favored limiting or prohibiting egress that would route traffic onto Dubois.
The commission’s recommendation is advisory; the Village Board is scheduled to consider the special use on June 8. Commissioners and staff said the redevelopment agreement and final design standards will be fleshed out in subsequent village-board and redevelopment proceedings.
