Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Special Education Restructuring topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board committee recommends moving forward on SULPA, staff proposes compliance position to handle new continuous reporting

Santa Rosa City Schools Board of Trustees · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff proposed reorganizing special-education operations ahead of forming an independent SULPA and recommended creating a data-specialist position to manage new continuous reporting rules; trustees asked for a financial-impact summary and approved a motion to include the proposal in the upcoming budget discussions.

District staff outlined a proposed special-education restructuring tied to creating a local SULPA. The plan would regionalize management of special-education services while building internal data- and compliance capacity to meet the state’s shift to near-immediate special-education reporting.

Staff recommended creating a data specialist 2 (reclassing an existing special-education technician) to handle state reporting and complex IEP data; a back-of-envelope estimate for the additional cost was cited at about $24,000 annually depending on experience. Staff noted recent state reporting changes moved from twice-per-year bulk uploads to near-real-time transaction reporting, prompting a need to strengthen internal capacity.

Trustees asked for a before-and-after organizational chart and a financial-summary table showing cost differentials for proposed reclassifications and new positions. Staff said some positions would be restructured when vacancies allow and that part of the SULPA costs could be folded into SULPA administrative funding after the district becomes its own SULPA (target date discussed as July 1, 2027). Trustees on the finance subcommittee moved and seconded a recommendation to include the restructuring in the budget development process; the board agreed to forward it to the full board for consideration.