Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Appointments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Civil Service Commission approves most candidate packets and tables four for later review

Denver Civil Service Commission · October 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During commissioner review the panel approved the majority of candidate packets reviewed, recorded several 'no' votes on a few candidates, and placed four candidates on hold for relisting at the next review due to insufficient commissioners for executive session.

The Civil Service Commission completed a scheduled review of candidate packets and recorded votes on multiple candidate IDs. Commissioners followed the announced vote order (Commissioner Foster, L Everett, then Stout) and approved most candidates; four candidates were placed on hold and will be relisted at the next review.

Dylan conducted the review and announced candidate identifiers in sequence; commissioners then voice-voted. After tallying the session, staff indicated there were four holds and that the commission did not have a sufficient number of commissioners present to move into executive session, so those packets will be carried forward.

Votes at a glance (candidate identifier — outcome — vote tally [Foster / L Everett / Stout]): - 363254 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 34374 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 36593 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 367510 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 329179 — tabled (hold) — yes / yes / abstain - 369311 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 370191 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 6102 — tabled (hold) — yes / abstain / yes - 266832 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 277242 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 371950 — failed — yes / no / no - 357445 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 361162 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 361745 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 368708 — approved — yes / no / yes - 2550348 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 342740 — approved — yes / yes / no - 36690 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 137416 — failed — yes / no / no - 205203 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 248076 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 372134 — approved — yes / yes / yes - 372133 — approved (after vote change) — yes / yes / yes - 329193 — failed — no / yes / no (final recorded: no) - 315197 — tabled (hold) — yes / abstain / yes - 371370 — tabled (hold) — abstain / yes / abstain

After the review the commission announced the four holds (candidates 329179, 6102, 315197 and 371370) will be relisted for the next review. Dylan said the held packets will be carried forward because the commission lacked sufficient members to convene an executive session at this time.

No formal appointments were finalized during the meeting; commissioners recorded approvals and holds according to packet review. The commission did not discuss specifics of individual applicant backgrounds on the public record during the vote sequence.