Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission clarifies historic-district rules, proposes explicit date ranges and siding standard
Summary
The La Conner planning commission reviewed proposed historic-preservation code amendments aimed at removing ambiguity about the district's period of significance and clarifying siding and material standards. Commissioners said the changes are meant to preserve character without freezing development.
Chair opened the meeting by distributing a handout and summarizing the planning commission's proposed updates to the town's historic-preservation district code, saying the changes are intended to clarify—not narrow—the district's purpose.
The most significant change discussed was adding an explicit period of significance to the code to avoid shifting "50-year" thresholds that can change every decade. The draft at points referenced a period beginning in the late 19th century (1875) and variously cited end dates used elsewhere in the draft language; the chair said the amendments aim to remove ambiguity about which era the town intends to preserve. "It just helps us to clarify the target character so that owners, staff, and commissioners aren't guessing," the chair said.
Commissioners discussed replacing descriptive language with regulatory text to improve enforceability. The draft removes the word "diverse" and instead states the code will "preserve architectural styles reflecting development of the town between [dates as proposed in the draft] and encourage compatible design and construction affecting historic resources." The chair said changing phrasing such as switching "avoid vertical siding" to "vertical siding shall not be used" is a clarification rather than a reversal of policy.
Members cited examples from other Washington towns to show that defined historic periods are a common practice: "The city of Snohomish defines its period from 1880 to 1930," the chair noted, and the commission reviewed how other jurisdictions structure review boards and design standards.
Commissioners also discussed what features the district is intended to capture, emphasizing vernacular cottages, Victorian, Colonial Revival and early Craftsman styles rather than a single, narrow style. The chair said the proposal is intended to protect the district's character "over time and across future conditions," not to freeze contemporary changes.
What happens next: the commission will finalize edits and forward the proposed amendments for state review and then return the measure to the town council for consideration of adoption, as noted by the chair.
Ending: The commission proceeded to vote on routine minutes and then moved into a detailed review of the town's sign and tree code updates later in the agenda.
