Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County rep: 5% of Ladera Ranch property taxes go to county; residents press for clarity on dump expansion

Ladera Ranch Civic Council · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Robby, speaking for Supervisor Foley, told the LRCC that about 5% of Ladera Ranch property taxes are allocated to the county, announced local town halls, said a crossing guard will be added at Meandering Trail, and said the office is investigating resident concerns about a proposed doubling of a nearby dump’s capacity.

Robby, representing Orange County Supervisor Foley, told the Ladera Ranch Civic Council on March 17 that roughly 5 percent of Ladera Ranch property-tax collections go to the county.

Robby also said sheriff expenses were cited at about $6 million in the county handout he provided, and he encouraged residents with further questions to follow up with the county CEO’s office.

He announced two upcoming community meetings: an E‑Bike Safety Town Hall at Ladera Ranch Middle School on April 6 from 3 to 5 p.m., and a Senior Support Town Hall at the RMV Guest House on March 26 at 2 p.m.

On local infrastructure, Robby said the county is planning Las Flores ramp improvements and will add a crossing guard at Meandering Trail. A resident raised concern about a proposal to double the capacity of a nearby landfill/dump close to SJHHS; Robby said the proposal had been presented without prior briefing to the supervisor’s office and that staff is looking into the matter.

Why it matters: property‑tax allocations affect local services and sheriff staffing; the resident concern about expanding dump capacity near a health system site prompted the county representative to investigate, signaling potential environmental and land‑use implications that may return to public debate.

The council adjourned at 8:06 p.m.