Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Goal4 Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Northshore School District review flags mixed critical‑thinking survey results and a drop in eighth‑grade reading proficiency
Summary
District staff told the school board that two survey‑based measures of critical thinking produce mixed results, with one item showing roughly half of students giving 'dissatisfying' responses; staff and trustees also flagged that only about 50% of eighth graders are assessed at grade level on a selected reading‑comprehension measure.
District staff presented the annual Goal 4 report — aimed at fostering innovative, creative and critical thinkers — at the Northshore School District board meeting.
Dr. Greg Foster, director of research and evaluation, framed the district’s working definition of critical thinking and reviewed two Panorama survey items the district uses to measure it. "If you accept that anything below a moderate agree…is dissatisfying, that means 50% of our students roughly are providing us dissatisfying responses on this item," Foster said, noting polarization in results and more variance within some subgroups.
Foster tied those perceptual items to reading‑comprehension data from I‑Ready and said the fifth‑to‑seventh grade progression looks different from the eighth‑grade snapshot. "This suggests something that's a lot more concerning, which is having students in grade 8 only being assessed at grade level standard 50% of the time," he said.
Staff stressed the difference between perceptual survey items and performance measures. A presenter noted that I‑Ready provides repeated, integrated assessment data useful to teachers, while the state SBA produces only an annual snapshot and does not supply the same facet‑level information.
Trustees asked whether the board should set a formal satisfaction threshold and requested comparison points from other districts. Foster responded that determining what counts as 'satisfactory' is a governance decision: "It would be inappropriate for me to decide what's satisfactory and not satisfactory," he said.
Staff outlined supports intended to strengthen the skills behind critical thinking: ethnic‑studies curriculum work, culturally responsive texts, alignment with new OSPI ELA standards, and cross‑curricular strategies to build academic vocabulary in middle grades. They also explained a drop in the district’s reported least‑restrictive‑environment percentage was due mainly to 87 additional students entering the system and scheduling effects rather than an overall reduction in high‑percentage LRE placements.
Board members and staff said the findings reinforce the need for strategic discussion next year about whether to continue measuring these items and, if so, how the district should respond administratively. The presentation closed with staff recommending that the board decide whether Goal 4's current measures will be maintained, refined, or retired as the district updates its strategic plan.
