Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Grand County approves $500,000 local match for Arches shuttle pilot after heated public debate
Summary
The Grand County Commission approved a $500,000 county contribution for a three‑partner Arches National Park shuttle pilot (total budget up to $3 million) on a 4–3 vote amid public concerns about transparency, funding mechanics and operational questions.
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Grand County Commission voted 4–3 on May 19 to commit $500,000 to a proposed Arches National Park shuttle pilot after extended public comment and split debate among commissioners. The pilot’s total budget is presented as up to $3 million, with the National Park Service proposed to provide $1.5 million, the State of Utah $1.0 million and Grand County $500,000.
Commissioner Brian Martinez presented the multi‑partner plan and described the shuttle as a response to longstanding congestion and visitor management challenges at the Arches entrance and US‑191 corridor. Martinez said he had reviewed available studies and expressed confidence in the proposed approach and interagency collaboration. County Attorney Stephen Stocks said legal review of the Cooperative Management Agreement would follow this funding decision, and Clerk/Auditor Gabriel Woytek asked for clarification on proposed funding offsets; no offsets were identified in the meeting discussion.
Public commenters during Citizens to be Heard repeatedly urged the commission to slow the process and provide more information. Several speakers, including Diane Allen and Rory Paxman, pressed for clearer explanations of the funding mechanism, additional operational studies and greater transparency. Others argued the proposal competes with private operators or duplicates less‑costly options such as Timed Entry. One commenter asked what would happen if the National Park Service’s $1.5 million did not materialize; staff responded that the proposed agreement would fail without the NPS contribution.
During deliberations commissioners debated where the county share should come from. The original motion would allocate $500,000 from TRT (Transient Room Tax) mitigation funds. Commissioner McCurdy offered a substitute motion to use Optional Sales Tax reserves (Fund 47) instead; the substitute failed on a 3–3 vote with Chair McCandless abstaining. The original motion then passed 4–3, with Commissioners McGann, Hedin and Hadler opposed and McCandless abstaining from the substitute tally but recorded as an abstention during the substitute vote.
National Park Service local Regional Director Lena Pace told the commission that the NPS had prioritized the project but that the $1.5 million commitment was not yet fully confirmed. The commission directed that a Cooperative Management Agreement would need legal review before implementation and made no vendor selection at the meeting; staff indicated Via had not been selected as a vendor.
The vote does not finalize the pilot; next steps identified at the meeting include legal review of the cooperative agreement and further coordination with state and federal partners. Opponents said they plan to press for greater transparency and clearer budget offsets before implementation.
