Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Resolutions Item 30 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Forestdale subdivision plan after neighbors' septic and traffic concerns
Summary
After residents raised concerns about septic encroachment and traffic access, the commission approved resolution item 30 (R2 option) for a Forestdale subdivision, asking for documentation from the health department and relying on a county traffic review that found no immediate roadway improvements required.
Get email alerts on the Resolutions Item 30 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Jefferson County Commission voted to approve resolution item 30, advancing a Forestdale subdivision consistent with the larger‑lot option (referred to in discussion as R2) after hearing neighbors' concerns about septic‑system encroachment and traffic safety.
Commissioner Scales, who requested separate consideration of item 30, said the community preferred R2 and pressed staff for confirmation that encroachment issues had been addressed. "We don't have anything from the health department substantiating that...so we're going by hearsay," Scales said, asking for written documentation to reassure neighbors.
Planning staff Josh said the developer's representative (Mr. Mitchell) met on‑site with the health department and that the department had "probed and found the septic fill lines for the adjacent property owner that had concerns." The commission asked staff to obtain written confirmation from the health department and to include conditions as necessary.
A county traffic reviewer and the landowner's representative explained the plan calls for using an existing connection (Eager Drive) and that Rosen Transportation had reviewed the connection. The county reviewer said the existing roads "can handle the new development" and that the number of trips would not trigger additional road improvements. The transcript records inconsistent references to the number of homes (mentions of approximately 27 and other figures); the precise unit count was not clearly specified in the meeting record.
After recapping that the encroachment and traffic questions had been addressed to the commission's satisfaction, Commissioner Scales moved the item; the motion was seconded and passed 4–0. Scales thanked Forestdale residents and the developer for their cooperation.
The commission's action was procedural approval at the meeting; staff follow‑up items included obtaining written confirmation from the health department regarding septic lines and recording any conditions tied to R2 approval.

