Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Demolition topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board issues SEQR negative declaration and approves demolition at 624 North Broadway; proposed replacement draws strong critique

Saratoga Springs Design Review Board · July 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Design Review Board declared a negative SEQR determination and approved demolition at 624 North Broadway on July 30. Board members and the Saratoga Springs Preservation Foundation criticized the developer's proposed multiunit replacement as contextually incompatible and urged substantial redesign.

On July 30 the Saratoga Springs Design Review Board issued a negative SEQR (SEQR) declaration for the demolition of an existing one‑story structure at 624 North Broadway and approved the demolition as submitted. The board then heard a presentation of a proposed three‑story, four‑unit building to replace the structure; the proposed design drew sustained critique from multiple board members and the Saratoga Springs Preservation Foundation.

The chair read through the SEQR questions and moved for a negative declaration, finding no large or important environmental impacts in the demolition proposal; the board seconded the motion and approved the negative declaration. The board then voted to approve demolition.

Architect George Olsen and his team presented a new‑construction concept with limestone panels at the base, full brick above, porches on corner bays, an elevator core and below‑grade parking. Several board members — including Ms. Kavada, Mr. Bennett and others — said the massing and urban/industrial aesthetic were out of scale and style for North Broadway, which they described as defined by porches, varied façades and a softer residential character. The Saratoga Springs Preservation Foundation submitted a letter saying the proposed design is not compatible with the historic district, citing rooflines, proportions, porches, and setbacks.

Board members recommended the applicant return with a design that better reflects local porch character and facade rhythm; while the demolition is approved, the proposed replacement was not endorsed as presented and will require redesign before final approval.