Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Certified Local Government topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic preservation board weighs Certified Local Government application and potential design-review impacts
Summary
Commissioners discussed how a Certified Local Government (CLG) application would trigger Secretary of the Interior design-review expectations for designated properties and noted that two locally designated districts adopted without design standards could be required to undergo review; staff will research reconciliation options and invite History Colorado to advise.
The Grand Junction Historic Preservation Commission spent the meeting’s second major discussion on the city’s proposed Certified Local Government application and a related municipal code amendment. Staff told commissioners that History Colorado’s CLG guidance requires designated properties—including properties within districts adopted without local design standards—to be subject to design review, a Colorado-specific interpretation that could expand review obligations for two of the city’s districts.
Staff said the change is not necessarily a National Park Service requirement but a state-level interpretation and that reconciling the Secretary of the Interior standards with the city’s existing downtown overlay and local compatibility requirements will require careful drafting. "The requirement would be... that we indeed do require a consultation of the historic preservation board before making any alterations to those properties," staff said during the presentation.
Commissioners identified three designated areas at issue: the North 7th Street Historic District (which the Commission and staff said already has a set of local standards), the Lincoln Park Historic Residential District and the Mile Keys Addition District. Staff noted the North 7th district includes roughly 35 structures as of a 2012 reference and that the other two districts were originally adopted without design standards.
Members discussed possible policy paths: adopt a code amendment that reconciles local standards with Secretary of the Interior principles, maintain the North 7th standards while developing a reconciliation approach, or remove designation for one or both districts adopted without standards so those properties would not automatically be subject to design review. Commissioners warned each option carries trade-offs—new design standards could impose unfamiliar constraints on homeowners, while abolishing a district could upset residents who value the designation.
The Commission asked staff to research how similarly sized Colorado CLGs manage dual or overlapping standards (Montrose and other communities were mentioned) and suggested inviting History Colorado staff and preservation officials from peer communities to brief the Commission. Staff said it would prepare options, a reconciliation approach for the code amendment, and a communications plan for affected property owners ahead of the Commission’s next meeting.
No formal policy decision or vote to alter district designations was made; staff will return with research and recommended language for the code amendment and outreach steps.
