Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters urge stronger review of TIFF notices and call for more housing support
Summary
During general public comment at the May 7 Johnson County meeting, a speaker urged the board to require financial projections from a city notice to form a TIFF redevelopment district, and a homeless advocate called for county action on housing and support for community providers.
During the general public-comment period at the Johnson County Board meeting on May 7, two attendees used their allotted time to press the board on housing-related issues.
A registered speaker identified in the transcript as Ben Hobert raised concerns about a city notice of intent to form a tax-increment financing (TIFF) redevelopment district, saying staff told the board no cost-benefit analysis had been provided to the county within the county's 30-day objection period. "The city should be told, 'Come back when you have projections,'" he urged, calling the request premature and asserting the county has a fiduciary obligation to citizens to review projections before waiving objections.
Brian Perkins, who identified himself as currently homeless, described a year of advocacy on behalf of people experiencing homelessness and called for coordinated county support for affordable and moderate-income housing. "We need the county because there's too many lives being lost every step of the way," he said, urging collaborative action with churches and community groups and praising steps listed on the meeting agenda.
Chairman Kelly moved promptly from public comment into the agenda's consent and action items; commissioners did not record a separate public-response or follow-up vote tied directly to Ben Hobert's TIFF-specific request during the meeting.
The record shows commissioners and staff later discussed housing tools (HOME funds, LIHTC, and IRB sales-tax exemptions) during the action agenda, and staff and commissioners emphasized timing for state LIHTC applications as a reason the county considered issuing resolutions of intent for IRB sales-tax exemptions to aid project competitiveness.
The meeting transcript contains inconsistent spellings for local place and person names in public comment (for example, the transcript variably renders the city name as "Shaune" or "Shauny"); those inconsistencies are reflected in the official record and were not resolved on the floor.
