Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Taxation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pittsburgh council introduces mechanical amusement-device tax; bill recommitted for public hearing

City Council of Pittsburgh · June 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City Council read a proposed Mechanical Amusement Device Tax that would impose annual fees by device class and estimated $2–3 million in revenue; the council voted 8–0 to recommit Council Bill 2026-544 to the Land Use committee for a public hearing.

Pittsburgh City Council on June 2 introduced a proposed Mechanical Amusement Device Tax and voted to recommit the measure to the committee on land use and economic development for a public hearing. The council's legislative projects manager read a statutorily required legal statement describing three device classes and proposed annual taxes: Class 1 devices (including video slot and similar machines) at $1,000 per device; Class 2 devices (machines offering small prizes) at $100 per device; and Class 3 devices (pinball, jukeboxes, darts, pool tables and similar) at $10 per device. The city projected initial revenue of about $2 million to $3 million per year.

The measure is Council Bill 2026-544. Councilman Carill led a series of procedural motions earlier in the meeting to discharge, amend, and ultimately recommit the bill to the land-use committee "and hold for a public hearing." That recommit motion passed on roll call, 8–0. The clerk recorded roll-call responses and the council chair confirmed the motion passed unanimously.

Supporters of the proposed tax framed it as a new general-revenue source to help stabilize infrastructure and the city budget; the legal reading presented the levy as a condition of certain business licenses or permits. Opponents of levies on similar activities have argued in other forums that taxation of devices can affect small local entertainment venues; during this meeting, public commenters and several council members noted equity and small-business impacts as areas for further review.

Next steps: Because council recommitted the bill to committee and held it for a public hearing, the ordinance will return to that committee for at least one public hearing and further deliberation before any final vote.