Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Mapping topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planners praise Bluff interactive zoning map, ask for road names, parcel fixes and airport overlay

Bluff Planning and Zoning Commission · June 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Bluff commission reviewed an interactive map from the Utah Geo Spatial Resources Center, asked for added road names, refined parcel boundaries, alley/access overlays and an airport/aviation overlay, and emphasized the map is a free service with limited capacity for custom requests.

The Bluff Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed an interactive zoning map provided pro bono by the Utah Geo Spatial Resources Center and requested a set of practical improvements to aid permitting and public clarity.

Chair Malia Collins thanked the map team and asked staff to request road names, lot divisions and a more accurate parcel overlay after commissioners identified places where county parcel lines did not match local surveys. “I tried it with Erin a little bit before this because she was in communication with Emma on Monday,” Collins said, praising the work and asking commissioners to prioritize the most important overlays.

Commissioners asked for several changes: road names for West Cottonwood Avenue and Mesa View Lane; parcel boundaries that reflect recent local adjustments (several commissioners pointed out houses that appeared on the wrong lot in the county overlay); a clear indication of abandoned or closed alleys and private easements so staff can determine legal access to lots; and an airport/aviation overlay including the town’s airport ordinance buffer (commissioners referenced a two-mile centerline limit).

Brian Whitney and others noted the town currently overlays the county parcel map, which may be misaligned in places, and recommended a parcel-data update or alternate source if available. Staff (Erin) reminded commissioners that the map is a free service and that additional or paid work could be considered later if the commission requests too many customizations.

Outcome: staff will forward detailed overlay and naming requests to the Utah Geo Spatial Resources Center; commissioners said the map will be a useful, ongoing planning tool once parcel and road-name fixes are implemented.