Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Relief topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Trustee asks commissioners to fund $3.9 million property-tax relief match; trustees cite ordinance commitment

Shelby County Committee One: Budget & Finance · June 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Shelby County Trustee proposed a $3.9 million county match for the state property tax relief program, saying the ordinance commits the county to a 100% match and suggesting $1 million of trustee revenue plus FY26 excess receipts could partially fund the match; commissioners asked why the mayor's proposal left the item out of the proposed budget.

Shelby County Trustee Reggie Newman told the Budget & Finance committee the county's ordinance requires a 100% match for the state property-tax relief program for eligible seniors and certain disabled veterans, and she proposed $3.9 million to meet the county's share for FY27.

Newman said the county could cover part of the match through $1 million in trustee commission revenue and an anticipated $1.7 million of excess FY26 trustee receipts that will roll to fund balance; the remainder would come from general-fund balance up to $2.9 million if needed. She said the ordinance that established the county match contemplates a recommendation from the trustee at budget time and confirmed the program's eligibility rules are set by the state (age 65+ with income thresholds, or 100% service-connected disabled veterans).

Several commissioners asked why the mayor's proposed budget did not include the trustee's recommended match. Newman said the program historically was handled in a restricted or grant-like way and that moving it into the trustee's budget streamlines administration and makes funds more visible to the county.

Committee action: No vote was taken; commissioners asked for further explanation of the trustee's revenue forecasts and requested that the finance office and trustee provide district- or zip-code-level participation data so the commission can see geographic distribution of recipients before finalizing the appropriation.

What happens next: Trustee staff and county finance will provide detailed FY26 revenue and participation data and return to committee before the June 10 budget action on Item 2.