Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Metro Community Choice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Milwaukie staff urge cautious approach as Metro’s participatory‑budget votes near
Summary
City staff told the Milwaukie City Council that Metro’s Community Choice participatory‑budgeting awards require local match, permitting and staff time and asked council whether to limit how many recommended projects the city would seek to implement.
Milwaukie public works director Peter Perelli and parks development manager Adam Moore told the City Council that Metro’s Community Choice process has produced hundreds of community ideas but that any awarded projects must be on public land and implemented by partner jurisdictions or NCPRD.
“None of these projects have gone through our CIP. They haven't gone through the planning commission,” Perelli said, adding that the city would not receive Metro’s final construction documents and that successful projects will need post‑award design, permitting and additional funding. He said, “Right now we have identified $85,000 in the CIP that we could utilize for one of these projects,” noting that most awards require matching funds.
Council members asked whether Milwaukie should announce a cap (for example, the top three or top five projects) or let the community vote proceed and then prioritize. Staff recommended letting votes play out while preparing a prioritization matrix and a clear estimate of staff capacity and likely match obligations to bring back to council.
Staff estimated that if many local projects were awarded the city could require roughly $600,000 in match over five years and that some projects would take three to five years to move from award to construction because of design, permitting and intergovernmental agreements. Perelli cautioned that permitting constraints include zoning, community service‑use reviews and, for projects touching waterways, state and federal permits.
Metro plans a public awards announcement at a July 21 meeting, staff said, and council members asked staff to return with a recommended approach — either a prioritized list tied to a budget threshold or a matrix showing which projects are feasible with existing staff and CIP resources. Council members sought a July follow‑up timed with the council’s CIP check‑in and asked staff to coordinate with Metro on what information can be shared publicly before the July 21 announcement.
The council did not take a formal vote; staff will return with additional analysis and recommended next steps.
