Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves committee appointments after debate, splits planning commission vote
Summary
Lower Macungie commissioners filled multiple advisory posts — including audit, environmental and zoning boards — after discussion about honoring volunteer recommendations and separating linked planning commission nominations into individual votes.
The Lower Macungie Township Board of Commissioners confirmed a slate of advisory and volunteer appointments at its Jan. 5 meeting, but not before members debated how closely to follow lower-board recommendations and whether to vote on two planning commission nominees in a single motion.
Appointments approved included David Shannon to the audit advisory committee and Christopher Holler to the building board/court of appeals. The board appointed three members to the Environmental Advisory Council — the motion named George Doggy for a shorter term and Jennifer Mack and Christ Avani for longer terms — and then confirmed Rebecca Ein as EAC chair.
A combined motion to appoint two planning commission candidates failed after several commissioners asked to vote on nominees individually. The board then voted separately to appoint one candidate (recorded in the transcript with variant spellings) and later appointed Jennifer Mack to the planning commission in a separate vote. During the discussion a resident, Julie McDonald, urged cross-pollination of volunteers between boards to improve communication.
The board also appointed Travis Cucker to the public safety advisory committee, Julie McDonald to the vacancy board and, by voice vote, Brian Higgins to the zoning hearing board. Several commissioners noted the zoning hearing chair had recommended a different candidate, prompting discussion about whether volunteer panels’ recommendations should carry weight at the board level.
Why it matters: Advisory committees and volunteer boards review land use, environmental and public-safety matters that guide staff recommendations and shape projects before they reach the full board. How the board chooses volunteers can affect that review process and the relationship between commissions and the board.
The board completed appointments by voice vote and moved on to routine business.
