Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Pop Up Parties topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
West Orange Planning Board sends proposed ‘pop‑up party’ ordinance back to council after questions on scope, exemptions and enforcement
Summary
The Planning Board reviewed an amendment to the town’s pop‑up party ordinance that would add ‘publicizing’ (to cover social‑media ads) and tougher penalties. Members asked the council to clarify definitions, exemptions for political or charitable events, and who enforces penalties before adoption.
The West Orange Planning Board on June 3 reviewed an ordinance amendment that would broaden the town’s existing pop‑up party prohibition to cover the publicizing of temporary residential events, including social‑media-promoted gatherings.
Consultant planner Malvika Apte told the board the governing body transmitted the amendment and that her memo finds the change "consistent with our goals and objectives of our master plan," in particular the plan’s aim to preserve residential neighborhood character and quality of life.
Council President Susan Scarpa, who sponsored the change, said the amendment responds to widespread resident complaints about noise, trash and disruption. "We intentionally made it a large fine because of the abuse that was going on," she said, adding that the drafters intended a strong deterrent.
Board members pressed for clearer definitions and enforcement language. Chair Dr. Robert Bagoff asked whether the draft’s reference to “residential zoning district” should instead say simply “residences,” noting there are pre‑existing single‑family homes in non‑residential zones. Board attorney Diana Powell McGovern recommended wording that covers any property used as a residence so the rule can be enforced consistently.
Members also questioned an exemption that would allow advertising and fundraising for bona fide charitable organizations or political campaigns. Mayor Susan McCartney said she was concerned the exemption is hard to define in practice: "It's not like they're filing any permit to have this pop‑up party. I don't know how that can be defined," she said.
Several members asked the council to clarify enforcement roles and the penalty structure. The draft allows three potential penalties for each violation—community service, a fine up to $2,000, or imprisonment up to 90 days—and leaves the choice to the judge. Captain Frank Noborine asked for clearer operational guidance for on‑the‑ground officers and for objective thresholds to distinguish a standard private gathering from an unlawful pop‑up event.
The board voted unanimously to return the draft to the Township Council with the board’s questions and suggested edits so council counsel can refine definitions, exemptions and enforcement language. The board’s motion to transmit the comments to council was adopted and the matter will be revisited after council response.
