Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Jail Classification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultant outlines jail classification requirements; committee enters executive session
Summary
A consultant told the Otsego County Public Safety and Legal Affairs Committee that state correctional law requires formal, objective classification, separate housing by sex, and medically assisted treatment policies; the committee then voted to enter executive session for security and personnel matters.
A consultant hired by the county told the Otsego County Public Safety and Legal Affairs Committee on April 16 that the county jail’s classification system must be formal, objective and aligned with state correctional statutes, and the committee moved into executive session to discuss security and personnel matters.
The consultant, who identified himself as B C, described his background in corrections dating to 1990 and said he was asked to review the county facility and its classification practices. He told members the jail is a roughly 100-bed facility laid out in a so-called popular design with about 40 individual cells and a 60-bed dorm, and that dormitory housing is increasingly difficult to reconcile with present-day intake and supervision requirements.
“Classification means it’s a process of assigning inmates to appropriate housing by determining their security and supervision risks based on a needs assessment and a risk assessment,” B C said. He cited Correction Law 500C and 500B as the statutory foundation, and referenced commission standards (7013) that require separate housing by sex, reporting obligations and procedures for transfers and overcrowding.
B C emphasized medical and safety requirements: he described state-mandated medically assisted treatment (MAT) for detainees who need it and repeated that detainees are typically entitled to seven hours out of cell each day unless a documented security reason prevents it. He warned that modern drug toxicity and an increase in detainees under observation or on suicide watch are driving up overtime and other jail costs.
The consultant also cited recent case law trends on housing equity, saying that a 2020 federal lawsuit had led courts to require comparable housing opportunities for males and females in some circumstances.
After the presentation, the committee voted to go into executive session for “matters which may imperil public safety” and for personnel/medical/financial records of particular individuals; the motion was seconded and carried. No substantive discussion from the closed session appears in the public transcript.
