Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Government topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Riverton council adopts amendments to animal control code despite public requests to clarify "aggressive" definition
Summary
On second reading the council approved Ordinance 26‑004 to revise Riverton's animal code (definitions, impoundment, running at large and nuisance animal provisions). Public commenters asked for clearer language distinguishing animals on owners' property and working/service animals; chief recommended future review if the department pursues a police canine program.
Get email alerts on the Local Government topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Riverton’s City Council adopted Ordinance 26‑004 on June 2, amending Title 6 (animals generally) to revise definitions and impoundment rules and to strengthen enforcement options for running‑at‑large and nuisance animals.
Staff and the police chief urged the changes as a tool to promote responsible pet ownership and reduce strain on the police department and local sheltering partners. The ordinance updates definitions in Chapters 6.04 and 6.08 (including "running at large" and impoundment) and includes a repeal clause for conflicting provisions.
Public comment focused on the proposed "aggressive animal" language. Chansy Wisellski asked that the definition be clarified so it does not treat an owner’s animal acting on the owner’s property the same as an unrestrained animal off that property. The police chief and staff advised that some refinements may be appropriate later — especially if the department pursues a police canine program — and recommended revisiting definitions to ensure exemptions for working or service animals.
The council opened the public hearing, received comment, closed the hearing and adopted the ordinance on second reading by voice vote.
What happens next: staff and legal counsel will finalize the ordinance text for publication and the city will incorporate any additional clarifications in a future amendment if needed, including language addressing working/service animals if the city implements a police canine program.

