Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Teacher Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears Q Comp update; staff say funds mainly support coaching and PLCs

Stillwater Area Public Schools Board of Education · June 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Deb Van Cly reported on the district’s Q Comp program, saying the district is in year two of a centralized coaching model and uses Q Comp funds primarily to sustain instructional coaches, PLC leads and mentors rather than large performance pay awards.

Deb Van Cly presented the district’s annual Q Comp report, describing it as the district’s alternative teacher professional pay system used to recruit, retain and support educators with job‑embedded professional development. "A large part of what we do is really around the job‑embedded professional development," she said, and noted the district uses Q Comp dollars to fund mentors, PLC leads and instructional coaches.

Van Cly told directors Stillwater is in year two of a centralized coaching model and that the program’s primary local benefit is sustaining coaching staff and PLC structures rather than large outcome‑based payouts. In response to a board question about comparisons with other districts, Van Cly said districts vary and that many have reduced the performance‑pay portion while keeping professional development efforts.

Board members asked whether Q Comp funding is performance‑based locally; Van Cly said the district’s model emphasizes professional development and that the performance‑pay component is a small percentage of local Q Comp allocations. Directors also raised a legislative concern: a past governor’s budget initiative had proposed eliminating Q Comp, and members noted the district should be prepared to explain to legislators how the district uses the funds to support student achievement and coaching at the building level.

Ending: The board received the report as an informational item; statutory or formal voting requirements will be handled at a subsequent meeting if required.