Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ai Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Students present AI use scale and 'H‑AI‑H' framework during Rossville Con School District meeting
Summary
Students Olivia Shutes and Cole Gird presented an AI student‑use policy mockup centered on an H‑AI‑H (human inquiry → AI → human reflection) model, an AI use scale of five levels, privacy rules and a student commitment to verify AI outputs; the policy was presented as a first reading and aligned with the handbook.
Two students, Olivia Shutes and Cole Gird, presented an updated student AI‑use policy mockup to the Rossville Con School District board that organizers said was developed by a committee of teachers, administrators and students.
The students explained an "H‑AI‑H" model—start with human inquiry, use AI to explore and then apply human reflection to evaluate AI output—and introduced a student commitment statement: "I will use AI to help me learn not to do the thinking for me." They also described an "AI use scale," a five‑level rubric ranging from level one (no AI) to level five (collaboration with AI), with teachers assigning the authorized level per assignment.
Presenters emphasized critical‑thinking steps for students using AI: verify names/dates/facts, inspect goals and rubrics, check for missing perspectives and flag biases. They also outlined privacy safeguards, advising students not to disclose personal identifiers and to use district‑approved platforms referenced in the presentation (transcript lists examples as Notebook LM, Gemini and "Magic School").
Board members confirmed that teachers would set per‑assignment expectations and that policy details relating to disciplinary responses would align with the student handbook. Presenters said the district aims to finalize materials for student and staff rollout in the fall.
The student AI policy was presented as part of the meeting's policy updates; the board listed it for first reading in the agenda and later took action on multiple policy items during the meeting packet, recorded in the minutes as approved "as presented." The transcript does not unambiguously record whether the AI policy was adopted in final form at this meeting; the district indicated further tweaks to the graphic and materials before broader release.
