Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sierra Club members criticize commissioner's prior remarks, allege bias and conflict of interest
Summary
During public comment at the May 21 meeting, Sierra Club members said a commissioner's prior remark called environmental advocates 'extortionists' and urged an apology; they also alleged the commissioner has development ties that present a conflict of interest, a claim not answered during the meeting.
At the start of the May 21 meeting of the City of Bakersfield Planning Commission, several Sierra Club members used the public‑statement period to criticize the commission's treatment of environmental testimony at a prior hearing and to press allegations against a commissioner.
Gordon Nip, vice chair of the local Sierra Club chapter, said commissioners and staff must follow democratic processes and argued that earlier comments at the May 11 meeting—specifically a remark that critics invoking environmental review were "extortionists"—were wrong and damaging. "For her and your information, the Sierra Club, as a matter of national policy, never accepts any money in settlement agreements... What we get out of this is perhaps... little cleaner air," Nip said.
Other speakers reinforced the charge and described potential professional consequences. Karen Erso, who identified herself as a registered nurse and nurse educator, said being publicly accused of criminal activity could affect professional licensure and called the accusation harmful.
One prepared speaker urged the commission to note the legal standing provided by state environmental law (referenced in the record as the state statute for environmental review) and argued that a commissioner who participates in approvals while having development interests could create bias or the appearance of bias. The speaker identified an ownership interest in the record (referred to as "Bryant Oliver Homes" in public comment) and said the commissioner should not vote on matters where that interest applies; no formal response from the named commissioner is recorded in the hearing transcript.
The commission did not take formal action on these allegations at the meeting. Chair Cassie Biddle proceeded to agenda business; public commenters asked that their statements be entered into the record and requested that the commission consider them in future deliberations.
