Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Superintendent Search topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
East Ramapo board says monitor rejected its unanimous superintendent pick; judge upholds monitor decision
Summary
The East Ramapo board told the public its unanimous choice for superintendent was rejected by state monitors; the board sued and a judge declined to overturn the monitors’ decision. The board has interviewed new candidates and plans further interviews but said the monitors still must sign off.
The East Ramapo Central School District board told the public at its June 2 meeting that state-appointed monitors rejected the board’s unanimously chosen candidate for superintendent and that a court earlier that day declined to overturn the monitors’ decision. President Rose said the board is “extremely disappointed” but will continue the search and has narrowed a recent pool to two finalists for final interviews.
The dispute centers on the monitors’ authority to review and approve superintendent appointments in this monitored district. President Rose said the board had “enthusiastically sent that recommendation to the state monitors” and that the monitors “rejected the board’s unanimous choice” without providing reasons. The board filed a lawsuit seeking to overturn the monitor decision; the judge denied that request, the board reported.
Why it matters: In districts under state monitoring, the monitors’ approval is a required step before a candidate can be appointed. The board said the monitors’ refusal to explain their decision complicates the district’s ability to secure stable leadership before the new school year.
What the board plans next: The board said it has worked with a search consultant and interviewed four candidates last week, narrowed that list to two finalists and will conduct final interviews as schedules allow (hopes expressed for the next one to two weeks). President Rose said the board will make an offer to one finalist after final interviews, but noted that the monitors will again be asked whether they will approve the choice and warned the monitors could again decline to approve a selected candidate.
Board and community reaction: During public comment at the start of the meeting, a community member urged the board to “complete the superintendent search without delay,” saying the district needs an experienced superintendent by July 1 to prevent another year of instability for students. Trustees and administrators reiterated the urgency during the superintendent’s report.
What’s next: The board said it hopes to have an announcement by the next board meeting; the monitors’ concurrence remains a required step before any hire can take effect.
