Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Train Wreck Park topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee to spend remaining train‑wreck parking grant on fencing, resurfacing and interpretive signs
Summary
After a final walk‑through, members identified three remaining grant tasks at the Great East Thompson train‑wreck car park: rail fencing, stone dust/gravel in eroded spots, and traffic‑calming elements; committee discussed using leftover funds for interpretive signs (fabrication ~$1,500–$2,500) and coordinating installation with DPW.
The committee reviewed final punch‑list items for the Great East Thompson train‑wreck car park and agreed on priority tasks to expend the last grant dollars: installing additional rail fencing near the parking area, adding stone dust and gravel where drivers have created ruts, and completing traffic‑calming elements that were deferred while repaving plans were confirmed.
Members said project drawings contained a few mapping errors (for example, a foundation labeled 'depot foundation' that referred to a different feature) and asked Paul to mark up the plan for Ken, the project foreman, to review. One committee member said the rail fence has already been installed and that remaining interpretive park items would be marked up for correction and scanning to Ken.
The group reviewed proposed interpretive signage and artwork. Draft panels using enhanced historical photos were priced at roughly $1,500–$2,500 for fabrication (materials and artwork) for a group of signs; installation would be additional. Paul suggested signs are within the project scope and that leftover funds could reasonably be reallocated to cover fabrication for the interpretive panels. The committee noted DPW asked that traffic‑calming work be scheduled after repaving (after July 2) and agreed to coordinate timing with the foreman and DPW.
Members also discussed maintenance needs (removing vegetation, addressing rusty hardware, and dog‑waste bag station replenishment) and agreed to consider an 'adopt‑a‑spot' volunteer program to help long‑term upkeep. The committee asked Paul to finalize cost estimates and forward them to the committee for comparison with the remaining grant balance before authorization.
