Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facility Disposition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff recommends selling or transferring Deming facility; board agrees to place sale/transfer option on future agenda
Summary
Laramie County School District #1 staff outlined options for the Deming facility — demolition, repurposing, mothballing or sale/transfer — and recommended a sale or intergovernmental transfer. The board directed staff to place the sale/transfer (Option 3) on a future agenda for formal action.
Laramie County School District #1 staff presented four disposal options for the vacant Deming facility and recommended the district pursue a sale or intergovernmental transfer, saying demolition and mothballing are impractical given the building’s condition and funding rules.
The presentation, led by Mr. Nette, compared the Deming facility to recent work on Miller Elementary and noted the building’s historic designation makes demolition legally and financially complex. Staff told the board the district is unlikely to qualify for state major-maintenance funding if a program placed in the building does not report students for state instruction.
Board members pressed staff on whether the district has received purchase interest and whether the district can limit a sale to buyers promising community use. Staff said sealed bids and ordinary market sales focus on price and typically would not include enforceable use restrictions; an intergovernmental transfer is one pathway where intended public uses might be known or negotiated. Staff also explained the district generally obtains appraisals and may contract a real estate agent to market a surplus facility.
On fiscal handling, staff said proceeds from the sale of a district capital asset would be directed into a capital projects/reserve fund segregated from school foundation dollars. Staff noted recent state guidance reduced the percentage of general-fund interest the state would claim, changing how interest on those funds is treated for the time being.
After discussion about tradeoffs — including uncertainty over what a future private owner might do with the property and the building’s small size for school reuse — the board agreed that the administrative recommendation to pursue a sale or transfer was the most practical path. The board directed staff to place the sale/transfer option (Option 3) on a future agenda for a formal motion and vote.
No formal vote on sale or transfer was recorded in this transcript; the board asked staff to return with procedural details (appraisals, marketing approach, or intergovernmental-transfer terms) when the item is scheduled for action.
