Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Budgeting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Joint boards direct staff on FY27 budget: 57/43 planning split, pool reserve and Fillbox Park funding
Summary
At the June 1 joint budget session, managers reported roughly $8M in the parks & rec fund and the boards gave direction to staff to use a 57/43 split for joint planning, earmark $2.0M for pool maintenance, and add Fillbox Park improvements (discussion centered on about $400,000); staff will finalize numbers after the year-end audit and return with detailed reports.
Get email alerts on the Local Budgeting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Town manager Tyler Sinclair presented the joint FY27 budget to the combined Jackson town council and Teton County commission on June 1 and asked both bodies for direction on unresolved items, including joint planning funding, parks capital projects and the river management fund.
Sinclair said the parks & recreation fund balance stood at roughly $8,000,000, with a 15% reserve requirement (about $1.5M) and FY27 capital needs near $1.1M, leaving approximately $5.4M. After backing out estimated river-management net revenue (staff estimated about $1.2M–$1.4M pending audit), the fund balance available to distribute was roughly $4.0M–$4.2M.
On the joint planning split, county administrator Jody Pond explained the proposed 54/46 adjustment reflected the senior long-range planner’s oversight of an associate planner. Commissioners and councilors debated multiple options; Commissioner Gardner proposed splitting the difference at 57/43 to break an impasse. Several members supported that compromise and staff captured it as direction to return budgets with a 57/43 split for FY27.
On parks staffing, the county supported a full-time public-engagement position in parks & recreation that the town declined to fund this year. Parks Director Tyler Florence said the position could largely pay for itself through modest membership gains and a recently approved fee schedule projected to add about $240,000 in revenue; town members asked for measurable performance metrics before agreeing to joint funding.
The boards also discussed the river-management program, which staff said should be treated like a quasi-enterprise fund (Fund 19) and have its net revenue backed out before the general parks & rec split. Staff and the parks director described river-management revenues as coming from permit fees and trip recertifications and said final figures would be determined in the year-end audit.
Commissioners and councilors spent substantial time on pool maintenance. Tyler Florence summarized an Aquatics Commissioning report that estimated about $3,000,000 in near- to mid-term fixes to keep pools operational for 5–10 years. A proposal to earmark $2,000,000 from the parks & rec reserve for pool maintenance (and to use an already-budgeted ~$400,000 for an immediate playground replacement at Fillbox Park) found significant support; staff said not all $3,000,000 would be spent in the coming fiscal year and that projects could be phased and prioritized. Florence committed to return with a pool-only staff report in August with prioritized costs.
Town manager Sinclair closed the budget discussion by saying staff would reflect the boards’ direction in the draft FY27 budgets: adopt a 57/43 joint-planning split for now, add Fillbox Park improvements to the FY27 parks & rec capital list (the parties referenced a Fillbox playground replacement estimated at about $400,000 during the discussion), and earmark $2,000,000 of the parks & rec reserve for future pool maintenance and repairs. Final allocation amounts and the fund-balance split will be set after the year-end audit and in subsequent staff reports.
The town and county will each adopt their budgets separately; this meeting provided joint direction to staff rather than final adoption.
Next steps: Staff will return with a prioritized pool repair report in August, refined revenue projections after the new fee schedule and the year-end audit, and a revised budget reflecting the 57/43 planning split and the earmarks the boards discussed.
