Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Legislation And Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sheriff updates advisory committee on courthouse screening, jail Medicaid work and license-plate reader legislation
Summary
The sheriff briefed the advisory committee on courthouse single-point-entry planning and legal constraints, Medicaid reimbursement efforts in the jail that the sheriff said are saving roughly $100,000 on prescriptions, and concerns that recently proposed state rules would sharply restrict use of automated license-plate readers.
Clallam County's sheriff told the citizens advisory committee that county officials are working on a courthouse single-point-entry plan to comply with a superior court administrative order and cited RCW 9.41.300 as the statutory backdrop for courthouse weapons restrictions.
The sheriff said the county has used a contracted security provider but is evaluating whether to use sheriff's deputies for screening or continue the contract until the board of commissioners sets formal policy. He cautioned that locking many interior doors to limit entrances could create egress and fire-code issues and described the practical balancing of safety, access and costs.
On corrections operations, the sheriff reported progress on a Medicaid transformation project in the jail that allows the county to enroll and continue Medicaid for incarcerated people. He said the program is already reducing prescription and provider costs and estimated savings "to the tune of a 100,000 or more" as the jail begins billing Medicaid for eligible services. The sheriff said establishing continuity of care before release could help reduce recidivism.
The sheriff spent a large portion of his briefing on recent legislation that would limit automated license-plate-reader (LPR) use. He said the draft law's restrictions on collecting LPR data in so-called "sensitive areas" (near schools, churches, clinics and other sites) and tighter data-sharing requirements would effectively make his office's mobile LPR technology unusable and could expose operators to criminal liability for inadvertent captures. "It's a shame," he said, calling the technology valuable for investigations and noting a vehicle-mounted LPR can cost about $10,000.
Committee members asked about possible alternatives, including focused placement on Highway 101 and pursuing grants or joint purchases along with other local agencies to build a countywide network. The sheriff said some fixed sensors and interagency data-sharing can help but that software and vendor compliance with the proposed law could raise costs and reduce vendor willingness to work in Washington.
No formal board action on the LPR or courthouse policy was taken at the meeting; the sheriff said policy work will continue with human resources and the board of commissioners and that the advisory group will be updated.
